A new interpretation of art. 267 (3) TFEU. ECtHR 's role in finding the missing piece of the puzzle?

Abstract

The provisions of article 267 TFEU provide a procedural framework in which the dialogue between the national and European courts on the interpretation, respectively on the interpretation and validity of European law is formalised. The starting point for the analysis is that the Luxembourg court does not act in this procedure as a reviewing court, since only national courts are competent to decide whether or not to make use of it. This study therefore aims to answer the following research questions: What are the remedies or sanctions for failure to use the preliminary ruling procedure, particularly in the case provided for in Article 267(3) TFEU, where referral is mandatory? What is the role of the ECtHR in the institutionalised procedural dialogue between Member State courts and the CJEU? Can the human rights protection system under the umbrella of the ECHR be considered as the missing puzzle piece for ensuring effective judicial dialogue grafted on the preliminary ruling procedure? Are the rules of the preliminary ruling procedure set by two actors, one from the EU structure (CJEU) and another from the Council of Europe’s sphere (ECtHR)?