Do We Need In Procedural Institutions Of The ,,Appeal After The Deadline” In Criminal Proceedings
Abstract
In the present article was carried out the analysis of the legal norms and judicial practice regarding the criminal procedural institutions the appeal after the deadline and the resuming of the trial of the criminal case in the absence of the convicted person. The introduction of a new extraordinary appeal of the procedure regarding the resumption of the trial of the criminal case in the absence of the convicted person, in accordance with Section 3 of Chapter V of the Title II of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Moldova [1], affects the inapplicability of the procedural institution the appeal after the deadline. The presented problem consists in the scientific substantiation and practical regarding the mentioned procedural institutions and the need to maintain in the law the provisions regarding the appeal after the deadline. Through this study, we want to provoke further analysis and discussion on this topic.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author fully assumes the content's originality and the holograph signature makes him responsible in case of trial.
Users can: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format; Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.