Controversies regarding the functional subject-matter jurisdiction of the courts in litigation involving the execution of public procurement contracts

Bogdan Ionuț Cozgarea

Bogdan Ionuț Cozgarea Doctoral School of Socio-Human Sciences of the "Dunărea de Jos" University of Galati

Keywords: public procurement; execution of public procurement contracts; legal remedies

Abstract

This study aims to assess the extent to which Directive 89/665/EEC on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of review procedures to the award of public supply and public works contracts has been correctly transposed into national legislation. The directive seeks to ensure the availability of effective and expeditious remedies for individuals harmed by violations of public procurement rules.

Given that both the previous legislative instrument—Government Emergency Ordinance No. 34/2006 on the award of public procurement contracts, public works concession contracts, and service concession contracts—and the current legislation—Law No. 101/2016 on remedies and review procedures concerning the award of public procurement contracts, sectoral contracts, and works and services concession contracts—have been subject to numerous amendments, and in view of the fact that jurisdiction over disputes relating to the performance of public procurement contracts has been successively transferred between civil and administrative courts, while appellate procedures have oscillated between appeal and second appeal (recours), thereby causing confusion both within the judiciary and among participants in the procurement process, one may conclude that the legislature has adopted at the very least an original approach to complying with the principle of effectiveness enshrined in the aforementioned European directive.

References

Ardelean E. 2025 ”Competența materială procesuală în soluționarea litigiilor având ca obiect executarea, rezoluțiunea, rezilierea, denunțarea unilaterală sau încetarea a contractelor de achiziție publică/Practică neunitară” în
https://www.bihorjust.ro/competenta-materiala-procesuala-in-solutionarea-litigiilor-avand-ca-obiect-executarea-rezolutiunea-rezilierea-denuntarea-unilaterala-sau-incetarea-a-contractelor-de-achizitie-publica-practica-ne/; accesat 17.06.2025 ora 18.40
Boroi G., Stanciu M. 2023 Drept Procesual Civil, vol. 1, Ediția a 6 a revăzută și adăugită, București, Hamangiu
Cătană E. L., 2019, Contenciosul actelor administrative asimilate Ediția a 2 a, București, C.H. Beck ;
Cătană, E. L., 2023, Drept Administrativ, Ediția 3 revăzută și adăugită, București, C.H. Beck,;
Cozgarea B. I. , Cătană E. L. 2025, ”Is cassation recourse an effective remedy in administrative contentious? Is there a need for a reform of the remedies and to replace cassation recourse with appeal?” in International Journal of Legal and Social Order, No. 1 pp. 92-106, DOI: https://doi.org/10.55516/ijlso.v4i1.221;
Curtea de Apel Iași ”Probleme de practică neunitară trim. III – IV 2022” disponibilă la adresa de internet:
https://ca-iasi.ro/files/userfiles/files/MinutePracticaNeunitara/Minute_Contencios/2023-02-16-minuta%20pt%20trim%203-4%20din%202022.pdf; accesat 16.06.2025 ora 11.20;
Grandia J, Volker L, 2023 Public Procurement Theory, Practices and Tools, Palgrave Macmillan, Switzerland https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18490-1;
Negruț V., 2017 ”The Legal Procedure for Solving Complaints Filed under the Depositions of Law No. 101/2016” in Acta Universitatis Danubius Juridica (AUDJ, vol. 13, no. 1/2017, pp. 39-47)
Negruț V. 2016 ”The Administrative-Jurisdictional Procedure for Solving Complaints Filed under the Provisions of the Law on Remedies and Appeals concerning the Award of Public Procurement and Concession Contracts” in Acta Universitatis Danubius Juridica (AUDJ, vol. 12, no. 2/2016, pp. 16-27)
Săraru C. S., 2024, Drept Administrativ – curs universitar, vol. II, București Universul Juridic;