Contraventionality And Contraventionalization: Challenges And Legal Implications
Abstract
In this paper, we seek to analyze the distinct concepts of „contraventionality” and „contraventionalization”, while also emphasizing their interdependence and the dynamic relationship through which they mutually influence and shape each other within the broader framework of legal regulation.
Although sporadically addressed in legal doctrine and lacking a fully consolidated theoretical framework, these concepts are further developed in this research, with the aim of enhancing their doctrinal articulation and encouraging their broader application within legal scholarship.
Thus, contraventionality refers to a set of actions which, although unlawful, do not reach the level of seriousness required to be classified as criminal offenses, and are instead regulated by specific legal norms that impose less severe sanctions. Conversely, contraventionalization denotes the legal process through which certain acts previously considered criminal offenses are reclassified as contraventions, thereby simplifying procedures, alleviating the caseload of judicial bodies, and recalibrating legal responses in accordance with the degree of social harm involved.
Moreover, we aim to elucidate both the intrinsic connection and the conceptual distinctions between these two notions, demonstrating how contraventionalization not only performs a decriminalizing function but also operates as a mechanism for shifting certain behaviors from the sphere of lawful conduct into the area of contraventional illicit acts, thereby influencing the level of contraventionality.
Through this contribution, we aspire to enrich the academic discourse surrounding contraventionality and contraventionalization by proposing new perspectives that advocate for the development of a clearer and more coherent conceptual framework, capable of enhancing the effectiveness of the legal system in regulating contraventional phenomena and better aligning it with the evolving needs and realities of contemporary society.
References
Catană, N. (2014). Executarea sancțiunilor contravenționale în România. Rezumatul tezei de doctorat/ Execution of misdemeanor sanctions in Romania. Doctoral thesis summary. Bucharest: Academia de Poliție „Alexandru Ioan Cuza” din București.
Contravenții constatate în anul 2023. Biroul Național de Statistică/ Contraventions found in 2023. National Bureau of Statistics. Available at https://statistica.gov.md/ro/contraventii-constatate-in-anul-2023-9478_61204.html.
Guţuleac, V. & Colotescu, M. (2008). Contravenţionalitatea: unele date statistice şi realităţi/ Contravention: some statistics and realities. Revista „Legea şi viaţa”/ „Law and Life” Journal, June 2008.
Guțuleac, V. (2008). Sancțiunile contravenționale ca măsuri de constrângere statală/ Contravention sanctions as state coercion measures. Legea și Viața/ Law and Life, December.
Larii, Iu. (2004). Criminologie/ Criminology. Chișinău: Museum.
Pădure, D., Grama, M. (2019). Conflictul în timp al legii penale de dezincriminare (Abolitio criminis)/ The conflict over time of the criminal law of decriminalization (Abolitio criminis). Studia Universitatis Moldaviae (Seria Ştiinţe Sociale/ Social Sciences Series), 2019, no. 11, pp. 78-90.
Spînu, I. (2013). Contravenția și contravenționalitatea. Căi de combatere. Teza de doctor în drept/ Contravention and contraventionality. Ways to combat. Doctor of Law Thesis. Chișinău. Available: www.anacec.md.
Ursuța, M. (2018). Dezincriminare şi decontravenţionalizare. Aspecte de drept material şi procesual. Incidenţa în afaceri/ Decriminalization and decontravention. Aspects of substantive and procedural law. Impact on business. Revista Română de Drept Penal al Afacerilor/ Romanian Journal of Criminal Business Law. No. 1, pp. 91-100.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author fully assumes the content's originality and the holograph signature makes him responsible in case of trial.