Advanced Methods to Characterize the Structural Materials of Religious Buildings Construction
Abstract
The paper aims to present a bibliographic study of works on the characterization of materials, for mosques and historical minarets, using destructive methods (uniaxial compression, tension direct and indirect), and non-destructive testing (Schmidt rebound hardness, ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV), scanning electron microscope (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) and their usefulness in the field of protection built cultural heritage. These religious buildings usually are constructed of brick masonry, stone, or/and reinforced cement concrete. Further, the form and amount of a structural defect is a function of the environment to which the structure is subjected. The different techniques used, for various construction materials, have determined the following parameters: the surface hardness, pulse velocity, structural composition, compressive strength, tensile strength and chemical composition. In general, these parameters govern the behavior under the different actions, and contribute to the strengthening and protection of the structure.
Downloads
References
[2]. Hussain A., Akhtar S., Review of Non-Destructive Tests for Evaluation of Historic Masonry and Concrete Structures, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Arab J Sci Eng., DOI 10.1007/s13369-017-2437-y, 2017.
[3]. Teomete E., Aktaş E., Structural Analyses and Assessment of Historical Kamanlı Mosque in Izmir, Turkey, Journal of performance of constructed facilities, ASCE, vol. 24, no. 4, p. 353-364, August 1, 2010.
[4]. Al-Omari A., Khattab S., Characterization of building materials used in the construction of historical Al-Omariya mosque minaret in Mosul's old city, Iraq, Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 33, 2020.
[5]. Maras M. M., Özmen A., Sayın E., Ayaz Y., Seismic Assessment of the Historical Sütlü Minaret Mosque, Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 66(2), p. 445-459, 2022.
[6]. ***, Rock characterization, testing and monitoring: ISRM suggested methods, International Society for Rock Mechanics (ISRM), 1981.
[7]. ***, ISRM - Suggested Methods for Determining Sound Velocity, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science and Geomechanical Abstract, 15, p. 53-58, https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(78)91678-9, 1978.
[8]. ***, ASTM - ASTM D 5873-14 Standard Test Method for Determination of Rock Hardness by Rebound Hammer Method, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, https://doi.org/10.1520/D5873-14, 2014.
[9]. ***, ASTM - D2845-05 Standard Test Method for Laboratory Determination of Pulse Velocities and Ultrasonic Elastic Constants of Rock, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, https://doi.org/10.1520/D2845-05, 2005.
[10]. ***, ASTM D2938 - 95 Standard Test Method for unconfined compressive strength of intact rock core specimens.
[11]. ***, ISRM - Suggested Methods for Determining the Uniaxial Compressive Strength and Deformability of Rock Materials, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 15, p. 99-103, 1979.
[12]. ***, ASTM D2936 - 20 Standard Test Method for Direct Tensile Strength of Intact Rock Core Specimens.
[13]. Briševac Z., Kujundžić T., Čajić S., Current Cognition of Rock Tensile Strength Testing by Brazilian Test, The Mining-Geology Petroleum Engineering Bulletin, 30, p. 101-114, (in Croatian), https://doi.org/10.17794/rgn.2015.2.2, 2015.
[14]. ***, ASTM - D2845-97, 1969, Standard method for laboratory determination of pulse velocities and ultrasonic elastic constants of rock, USA, 1996.
[15]. ***, TS-699 - Natural building stones, Methods of inspection and laboratory testing, Turkish Standard, Turkey, 1987.