Experimental Evaluation of Patterned Reflective Surfaces for Solar Glare Reduction in Small UAV Platforms
Abstract
Small unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) increasingly require optical signature control in order to reduce visual detectability during daylight operations. This study investigates the influence of mirror-type polymer surface treatments on solar glare behavior and proposes a patterned reflective configuration as a passive mitigation strategy. A small multirotor UAV platform was partially covered (35–40%) with a PET-based reflective film exhibiting high specular reflectance (approximately 80–85%), and its visual response was evaluated under direct solar illumination.
Experimental observations indicated that continuous mirror-like surfaces generate intense specular glints for surface–sun incidence angles between approximately 20° and 45°, with glare visibility durations of 1.5–2.0 seconds. To reduce glare intensity, a segmented surface pattern was introduced, decreasing the estimated effective specular area from 30–35% to 15–20%. The patterned configuration demonstrated a shorter glare duration (0.5–0.8 seconds) and a proportional reduction in glare alignment probability. The results indicate that while reflective polymer coatings may contribute to background blending under diffuse lighting conditions, continuous mirror-like surfaces increase detection risk under direct sunlight. Patterned segmentation represents a low-cost, geometrybased approach for solar glint mitigation and optical camouflage enhancement in small UAV platforms.
Downloads
References
[2]. Doherty P., Rudol P., A UAV search and rescue scenario with human body detection and geolocalization, Advances in Artificial Intelligence, 4830, p. 1-13, 2007.
[3]. Zhang L., et al., Comparing human performance on target localization in near infrared and long wave infrared for cluttered environments, Sensors, 24(20), 6662, 2024.
[4]. Schowengerdt R. T., Remote Sensing: Models and Methods for Image Processing, 3rd ed., Academic Press, 2007.
[5]. Hecht E., Optics, 5th ed., Pearson Education, 2016.
[6]. Bennett J. M., Mattsson L., Introduction to Surface Roughness and Scattering, 2nd ed., Optical Society of America, 2014.
[7]. Chipman R. A., et al., Polarized Light and Optical Systems, CRC Press, 2018.
[8]. Nero G., et al., Reflective signatures of unresolved objects, Optics Express, 32(15), p. 26167-26183, 2024.
[9]. Richards J. A., Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis: An Introduction, 5th ed., Springer, 2013.
[10]. Lillesand T., et al., Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation, 7th ed., Wiley, 2015.
[11]. Zhu H., et al., Multispectral camouflage for infrared, visible, lasers and microwave with radiative cooling, Nature Communications, 12, 1805, 2021.
[12]. Shirke N., et al., Recent advances in stealth coating, Polymer Bulletin, 81, p. 1-30, 2024.
[13]. Liu Y., et al., 2D or not 2D: Shape-programming polymer sheets, Progress in Polymer Science, 52, p. 79-106, 2016.
[14]. Goodrich M. A., et al., Supporting wilderness search and rescue using a camera-equipped mini UAV, Journal of Field Robotics, 25(1-2), p. 89-110, 2008.
[15]. Kwan C., Budavari B., Enhancing small moving target detection performance in low-quality and long-range infrared videos using optical flow techniques, Remote Sensing, 12, 4024, 2020.
[16]. Schaepman-Strub C., et al., Reflectance quantities in optical remote sensing—Definitions and case studies, Remote Sensing of Environment, 103(1), p. 27-42, 2006.
[17]. Rozantsev A., et al., Detecting flying objects using a single moving camera, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 39(5), p. 879-892, 2017.
[18]. Marin F.-B., Marin M., Drone detection using image processing based on deep learning, Annals of “Dunarea de Jos” University of Galati, Fascicle IX: Metallurgy and Materials Science, 44(4), p. 36-39, 2021.
