Estimation of linear hydrodynamic derivatives of a 37000 tdw chemical tanker using virtual captive model tests
Keywords:
manoeuvrability, hydrodynamic derivatives, CFD
Abstract
Forecasting the hydrodynamic properties of a ship is crucial for assessing its maneuvering capabilities. This study presents the results of static drift and circular motion simulations conducted on a 37000 tdw chemical tanker. The calculations were carried out using the ISIS-CFD solver, accessible through the FineTM/Marine academic license provided by NUMECA. The flow solution was obtained by numerically solving the Reynolds-Averaged Navier Stokes equations, employing the k-ω Shear Stress Transport (SST) model to represent turbulence. The simulation results were used to determine the linear hydrodynamic derivatives, which were then compared with hydrodynamic derivatives estimated with empirical formulas proposed by Clarke et. al. [1] and Tribon Initial Design module in the absence of experimental results.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
[1] D. Clarke, P. Gedling, and G. Hine, “The Application of Manoeuvring Criteria in Hull Design Using Linear Theory,” Proc. RINA Spring Meet., London 1982.
[2] M. A. Abkowitz, “Lectures on Ship Hydro-dynamics-Steering and Manoeuvrability,” Hydro- Aerodyn. Lab., vol. Report No. Hy-5, 1964.
[3] Y. Yoshimura, “Mathematical Model for Manoeuvring Ship Motion (MMG Model)”.
[4] L. Crudu, R. Bosoancă, and D. Obreja, “A comparative review of the resistance of a 37,000 dwt Chemical Tanker based on experimental tests and calculations,” Tech. Romanian J. Appl. Sci. Technol., vol. 1, pp. 59–66, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.47577/technium.v1i.32.
[5] V. Bertram, Practical ship hydrodynamics. Oxford ; Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2000.
[6] E. V. Lewis, “Principles of Naval Architecture Second Revision”.
[7] D. Obreja, R. Nabergoj, L. Crudu, and S. Păcuraru-Popoiu, “Identification of hydrodynamic coefficients for manoeuvring simulation model of a fishing vessel,” Ocean Eng., vol. 37, no. 8–9, pp. 678–687, Jun. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2010.01.009.
[8] K. Dai and Y. Li, “Manoeuvring Prediction of KVLCC2 with Hydrodynamic Derivatives Generated by a Virtual Captive Model Test,” Pol. Marit. Res., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 16–26, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.2478/pomr-2019-0062.
[9] R. Bosoanca and L. Crudu, “INFLUENCE OF AFT MODIFICATIONS ON MANOEUVRABILITY CHARACTERISTICS OF A TANKER BASED ON FULL SCALE TRIALS,” 2014.
[10] H. Islam, Md. M. Rahaman, L. Afroz, and H. Akimoto, “Estimation of linear hydrodynamic derivatives of a VLCC using static drift simulation,” presented at the DISRUPTIVE INNOVATION IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING FOR INDUSTRY COMPETITIVENESS: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Mechanical Engineering (ICOME 2017), Surabaya, Indonesia, 2018, p. 040021. doi: 10.1063/1.5044331.
[11] S. Janardhanan and P. Krishnankutty, “Determination of Linear and Non-linear Hydrodynamic Derivatives of a Surface Ship in Manoeuvring Using CFD Method,” in Advances in Visualization and Optimization Techniques for Multidisciplinary Research, D. Vucinic, F. Rodrigues Leta, and S. Janardhanan, Eds., in Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. , Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020, pp. 95–121. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-9806-3_4.
[12] S. Inoue, M. Hirano, and K. Kijima, “Hydrodynamic derivatives on ship manoeuvring,” Int. Shipbuild. Prog., vol. 28, no. 321, pp. 112–125, May 1981, doi: 10.3233/ISP-1981-2832103.
[13] A. S. Bekhit and A. Lungu, “Numerical Simulation for Predicting Ship Resistance and Vertical Motions in Regular Head Waves,” in Volume 2: CFD and FSI, Glasgow, Scotland, UK: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Jun. 2019, p. V002T08A009. doi: 10.1115/OMAE2019-95237.
[14] T. T. Nguyen, H. K. Yoon, Y. Park, and C. Park, “Estimation of Hydrodynamic Derivatives of Full-Scale Submarine using RANS Solver,” J. Ocean Eng. Technol., vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 386–392, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.26748/KSOE.2018.6.32.5.386.
[15] “FineMarine 10.2 Documentation Platform.”
[2] M. A. Abkowitz, “Lectures on Ship Hydro-dynamics-Steering and Manoeuvrability,” Hydro- Aerodyn. Lab., vol. Report No. Hy-5, 1964.
[3] Y. Yoshimura, “Mathematical Model for Manoeuvring Ship Motion (MMG Model)”.
[4] L. Crudu, R. Bosoancă, and D. Obreja, “A comparative review of the resistance of a 37,000 dwt Chemical Tanker based on experimental tests and calculations,” Tech. Romanian J. Appl. Sci. Technol., vol. 1, pp. 59–66, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.47577/technium.v1i.32.
[5] V. Bertram, Practical ship hydrodynamics. Oxford ; Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2000.
[6] E. V. Lewis, “Principles of Naval Architecture Second Revision”.
[7] D. Obreja, R. Nabergoj, L. Crudu, and S. Păcuraru-Popoiu, “Identification of hydrodynamic coefficients for manoeuvring simulation model of a fishing vessel,” Ocean Eng., vol. 37, no. 8–9, pp. 678–687, Jun. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2010.01.009.
[8] K. Dai and Y. Li, “Manoeuvring Prediction of KVLCC2 with Hydrodynamic Derivatives Generated by a Virtual Captive Model Test,” Pol. Marit. Res., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 16–26, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.2478/pomr-2019-0062.
[9] R. Bosoanca and L. Crudu, “INFLUENCE OF AFT MODIFICATIONS ON MANOEUVRABILITY CHARACTERISTICS OF A TANKER BASED ON FULL SCALE TRIALS,” 2014.
[10] H. Islam, Md. M. Rahaman, L. Afroz, and H. Akimoto, “Estimation of linear hydrodynamic derivatives of a VLCC using static drift simulation,” presented at the DISRUPTIVE INNOVATION IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING FOR INDUSTRY COMPETITIVENESS: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Mechanical Engineering (ICOME 2017), Surabaya, Indonesia, 2018, p. 040021. doi: 10.1063/1.5044331.
[11] S. Janardhanan and P. Krishnankutty, “Determination of Linear and Non-linear Hydrodynamic Derivatives of a Surface Ship in Manoeuvring Using CFD Method,” in Advances in Visualization and Optimization Techniques for Multidisciplinary Research, D. Vucinic, F. Rodrigues Leta, and S. Janardhanan, Eds., in Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. , Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020, pp. 95–121. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-9806-3_4.
[12] S. Inoue, M. Hirano, and K. Kijima, “Hydrodynamic derivatives on ship manoeuvring,” Int. Shipbuild. Prog., vol. 28, no. 321, pp. 112–125, May 1981, doi: 10.3233/ISP-1981-2832103.
[13] A. S. Bekhit and A. Lungu, “Numerical Simulation for Predicting Ship Resistance and Vertical Motions in Regular Head Waves,” in Volume 2: CFD and FSI, Glasgow, Scotland, UK: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Jun. 2019, p. V002T08A009. doi: 10.1115/OMAE2019-95237.
[14] T. T. Nguyen, H. K. Yoon, Y. Park, and C. Park, “Estimation of Hydrodynamic Derivatives of Full-Scale Submarine using RANS Solver,” J. Ocean Eng. Technol., vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 386–392, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.26748/KSOE.2018.6.32.5.386.
[15] “FineMarine 10.2 Documentation Platform.”
Published
2023-12-04
How to Cite
1.
Popa F, Bosoancă R. Estimation of linear hydrodynamic derivatives of a 37000 tdw chemical tanker using virtual captive model tests. Annals of ”Dunarea de Jos” University of Galati. Fascicle XI Shipbuilding [Internet]. 4Dec.2023 [cited 18Nov.2024];46:11-8. Available from: https://gup.ugal.ro/ugaljournals/index.php/fanship/article/view/6289
Issue
Section
Articles
